Using the weighted-average method, compute equivalent units, cost per equivalent unit, ending WIP cost, and cost of units transferred out for Weston Products’ Grinding Department (May) given: beginning WIP 45,000 lb (materials $66,600, conversion $46,350; 100% materials, 30% conversion), started 337,000 lb, ending WIP 124,000 lb (100% materials, 70% conversion), May costs added materials $559,880 and conversion $350,170.
Total pounds to account for are 382,000 (45,000 beginning + 337,000 started), with 258,000 pounds transferred out and 124,000 in ending WIP. Weighted-average equivalent units are 382,000 for materials and 344,800 for conversion. Costs per equivalent unit are $1.64 for materials ($626,480 ÷ 382,000) and $1.15 for conversion ($396,520 ÷ 344,800). Ending WIP costs are $203,360 materials and $99,820 conversion, total $303,180; transferred-out costs are $423,120 materials and $296,700 conversion, total $719,820.
What you are trying to produce in a weighted-average process-costing problem
You need four things: (1) physical flow of units, (2) equivalent units (EUP) for materials and conversion, (3) cost per EUP using total costs (beginning WIP + costs added), and (4) assign total costs to ending WIP and to units transferred out.
1) Reconcile the physical flow of pounds
Pounds to account for:
- Beginning work in process (WIP): $45{,}000$
- Started in May: $337{,}000$
$$45{,}000 + 337{,}000 = 382{,}000 \text{ lb total}$$
Pounds accounted for:
- Ending WIP: $124{,}000$
- Transferred out to Mixing: $$382{,}000 - 124{,}000 = 258{,}000 \text{ lb}$$
2) Compute equivalent units of production (weighted-average)
Weighted-average treats all units completed this period as 100% complete for the current department, and it includes beginning WIP in the “units completed” figure.
Materials EUP
Materials are added at the start, so both completed units and ending WIP are 100% complete for materials.
$$\text{EUP (materials)} = 258{,}000 + 124{,}000(1.00) = 382{,}000$$
Conversion EUP
Completed units are 100% converted; ending WIP is 70% converted.
$$\text{EUP (conversion)} = 258{,}000 + 124{,}000(0.70) = 258{,}000 + 86{,}800 = 344{,}800$$
3) Compute cost per equivalent unit
Under weighted-average, use total costs to account for (beginning WIP costs + costs added in May).
Total costs to account for
Materials: $$66{,}600 + 559{,}880 = 626{,}480$$ Conversion: $$46{,}350 + 350{,}170 = 396{,}520$$
Cost per EUP
Materials: $$\$\text{ per EUP (materials)} = \frac{626{,}480}{382{,}000} = 1.64$$ Conversion: $$\$\text{ per EUP (conversion)} = \frac{396{,}520}{344{,}800} = 1.15$$
4) Assign costs to ending WIP and transferred out
Ending WIP cost
Materials in ending WIP: $$124{,}000 \times 1.64 = 203{,}360$$ Conversion in ending WIP (only 70% complete): $$86{,}800 \times 1.15 = 99{,}820$$ Total ending WIP: $$203{,}360 + 99{,}820 = 303{,}180$$
Cost of units transferred out
Transferred out (258,000 lb) are 100% for both cost categories:
Materials: $$258{,}000 \times 1.64 = 423{,}120$$ Conversion: $$258{,}000 \times 1.15 = 296{,}700$$ Total transferred out: $$423{,}120 + 296{,}700 = 719{,}820$$
Quick check (cost reconciliation)
$$303{,}180 + 719{,}820 = 1{,}023{,}000$$ Total costs to account for: $$626{,}480 + 396{,}520 = 1{,}023{,}000$$ They match, so the allocations are consistent.
- Direct Labor Efficiency Variance (Swan Company)
- Replace vs Keep Machine: 4-Year Cash Flow Comparison
- May COGS and Ending Inventory in Job Order Costing
- Standard Cost Variance Journal Entries (Materials & Labor)
- Direct Labor Cost in June for Jobs 602, 603, 604
- Journal Entry for Payroll Withholdings May 1–15
- Petty Cash and Cash Short/Over Journal Entries
- Sunland Corp 2029 Taxable Income and Taxes Payable
Comments (0)
Please to leave a comment.