Explain Molecular Orbital Theory (MOT) and use MOT to explain the magnetic nature of the O₂ molecule
Molecular Orbital Theory says atomic orbitals combine to form molecular orbitals delocalized over the whole molecule; these MOs are filled by electrons following Aufbau, Pauli exclusion, and Hund’s rule. For O₂, the valence MO configuration is $(\sigma_{2s})^2(\sigma^*_{2s})^2(\sigma_{2p_z})^2(\pi_{2p_x})^2(\pi_{2p_y})^2(\pi^*_{2p_x})^1(\pi^*_{2p_y})^1$, which leaves two unpaired electrons in the degenerate $\pi^*$ antibonding orbitals. Because it has unpaired electrons, O₂ is paramagnetic (it is attracted into a magnetic field), and its bond order is $2$.
What MOT is trying to explain
Lewis structures describe bonding using localized pairs, but they cannot correctly predict some properties, like the observed paramagnetism of $O_2$. Molecular Orbital Theory fixes this by treating bonding electrons as occupying orbitals spread over both atoms.
Core ideas of Molecular Orbital Theory
When two atomic orbitals (AOs) of similar energy and proper symmetry overlap, they combine to form two molecular orbitals (MOs):
- A bonding MO (lower energy), with electron density between the nuclei
- An antibonding MO (higher energy), written with an asterisk $^*$, with a node between the nuclei
Electrons fill MOs using:
- Aufbau principle: fill lower-energy MOs first
- Pauli exclusion: max 2 electrons per MO with opposite spins
- Hund’s rule: in degenerate MOs (same energy), electrons stay unpaired as long as possible
MO energy order relevant for $O_2$
For second-row diatomic molecules from oxygen onward ($O_2, F_2, Ne_2$), the usual valence MO order is: $$\sigma_{2s} < \sigma^*_{2s} < \sigma_{2p_z} < \pi_{2p_x}=\pi_{2p_y} < \pi^*_{2p_x}=\pi^*_{2p_y} < \sigma^*_{2p_z}$$
Filling the MOs for $O_2$
Each oxygen has 6 valence electrons, so $O_2$ has 12 valence electrons to place in these MOs.
Filling in order gives: $$ (\sigma_{2s})^2(\sigma^*_{2s})^2(\sigma_{2p_z})^2(\pi_{2p_x})^2(\pi_{2p_y})^2(\pi^*_{2p_x})^1(\pi^*_{2p_y})^1 $$
Notice the key result: the two $\pi^*$ orbitals are degenerate, so by Hund’s rule they each get one electron before pairing.
Why $O_2$ is paramagnetic
Magnetism depends on whether there are unpaired electrons:
- Paramagnetic: one or more unpaired electrons
- Diamagnetic: all electrons paired
In $O_2$, the last two electrons occupy separate $\pi^*_{2p}$ antibonding orbitals, so there are two unpaired electrons. That is why $O_2$ is paramagnetic and is attracted into a magnetic field.
Extra result MOT gives: bond order of $O_2$
Bond order in MOT is: $$\text{Bond order} = \frac{N_b - N_a}{2}$$ where $N_b$ is bonding electrons and $N_a$ is antibonding electrons.
For $O_2$ (valence MOs):
- Bonding electrons: $\sigma_{2s}(2) + \sigma_{2p_z}(2) + \pi_{2p_x}(2) + \pi_{2p_y}(2) = 8$
- Antibonding electrons: $\sigma^*_{2s}(2) + \pi^*_{2p_x}(1) + \pi^*_{2p_y}(1) = 4$
So, $$\text{Bond order} = \frac{8-4}{2} = 2$$ This matches the idea of a double bond, while also correctly predicting paramagnetism (which Lewis structures miss).
- Low ionization energy effect on metallic bonding
- Carbon-14 Remaining After 11,500 Years (Half-Life 5730)
- How Many Electrons Are in a Lithium Ion (Li+)?
- How many electrons are in an N3− ion?
- Distance Between Neon Atoms When Heated
- Metal Liquid at Room Temperature Used in Thermometers
- Period, Group (Family), Atomic Radius, and Ion
- Grams of NaOH and LiOH to Remove 288 g CO₂
Comments (0)
Please to leave a comment.