Which option best describes the main difference between science and pseudoscience? A) Science deals with beliefs, and pseudoscience deals with evidence. B) Science deals with collecting opinions, and pseudoscience does not. C) Science is objective, and pseudoscience is subjective. D) Science does not involve a process, and pseudoscience does.
C) Science is objective, and pseudoscience is subjective. Science relies on objective methods such as testable hypotheses, evidence, and reproducible results, while pseudoscience often depends on subjective interpretation, anecdotes, or claims that are not testable or falsifiable.
What you are looking for in the correct choice
The key difference is about method: science uses objective, testable, repeatable procedures to evaluate claims. Pseudoscience often imitates scientific language but does not follow those standards, especially testability and willingness to change when evidence contradicts the claim.
Why option C matches science vs. pseudoscience
- Science is objective: it aims to reduce bias by using measurements, controlled experiments (when possible), peer review, and reproducibility.
- Pseudoscience is subjective: it commonly leans on personal belief, anecdotes, selective evidence, and explanations that cannot be reliably tested or disproven.
Why the other options are wrong
- A is backwards. Science is based on evidence; pseudoscience often rests on belief and untested claims.
- B is incorrect. Science does not “collect opinions” as proof; it collects data and evidence.
- D is incorrect. Science very much involves a process (the scientific method). Pseudoscience often lacks a rigorous, self-correcting process.
Quick check
If a claim cannot be tested or could never be proven wrong, it is usually moving away from science and toward pseudoscience.
Comments (0)
Please to leave a comment.